Is Dominion in Cahoots with the Democratic Party?

While the propagandists claim this suit is proof the 2020 election was the most free and fair in American history, the reality is quite the opposite.

It’s certainly understandable that Dominion Voting Systems would worry about its reputation. After all, the company’s entire grift is reliant upon states, counties, and cities leasing their electronic voting equipment with U.S. tax payer dollars.

The left is ecstatic about the possibility that this Dominion defamation law suit against Fox News will finally achieve that which they have tried and failed to do — silence one of the most powerful voices of dissent in America.

While the propagandists claim this suit is proof the 2020 election was the most free and fair in American history, the reality is quite the opposite.

According to Dominion any allegations that their electronic voting machines were vulnerable, glitchy, or even tampered with — resulting in a rigged election the left calls ‘the Big Lie’ — are baseless conspiracy theories. In fact, the entire premise of Dominion’s suit is based upon its counter claim that “Dominion emerged from the election with arguably the most-tested, most- scrutinized, and most-proven voting technology in recent history.”

But is this defiant claim based on any facts? Not really — only the desperate assertions of the Democratic Party and a voting machine company, which both need it to be true for their survival.

During discovery, Fox News obtained internal communications and solicited interviews from Dominion, which illustrate that Dominion itself didn’t believe its machines were reliable.

Mark Beckstrand, a Dominion Sales Manager, testified that a Dominion machine was “hacked” in Michigan. Weeks before the 2020 presidential election, Dominion’s Director of Product Strategy and Security, Eric Coomer, acknowledged in private that “our shit is just riddled with bugs.”

In 2019, Coomer noted that “our products suck” and in an email Coomer sent on January 5, 2018, he identified a critical bug that resulted in incorrect results and complained that “we don’t address our weaknesses effectively!”

There appears to be a disconnect between the public confidence Dominion expresses in its products and the private distrust.

But that’s not the only Dominion lie. Their claim the company emerged from 2020 with the most tested and most scrutinized machines is also false.

In 2020 in Georgia, after glitches prevented voters from casting ballots on Dominion Voting Machines on election day, a Dominion representative told election supervisor Marcia Ridley that it was the result of Dominion uploading an update during the 11th hour.

Dominion subsequently denied that any if its representatives ever told Ridley such a thing. So who was lying? Despite its denial, Dominion failed to explain what had caused the problem.

In Antrim County, Michigan, where Dominion voting machines were used,  political observers were flummoxed when the deep red county mysteriously flipped blue for Biden. The ‘mistake’ was attributed to a software glitch.

The erroneous unofficial results were rectified and Trump won the county, but Dominion and the media insisted that the error was due to human error. A security expert told the media that Dominion “software should be designed to detect and prevent” such a glitch but Dominion publicly insisted that it wasn’t their fault.

Privately, however, Dominion’s Director of Product Strategy and Security, told Dominion Vice President Kay Stimson that the security expert wasn’t “entirely wrong.”

And in Maricopa County, Arizona — the subject of great controversy in the 2020 election — Dominion refused to cooperate with the State Senate’s requests to secure access to routers and other relevant materials to scrutinize Dominion’s software and equipment and complete their audit.

The reality is that Dominion has evaded scrutiny by claiming that granting access to the very hardware required to determine any malfeasance — routers, for example — poses a security risk.

In essence, we’re just supposed to take Dominion’s word for it.

It’s ironic that Dominion Voting Systems, which accuses Fox of lying, is lying itself in their own lawsuit. It’s also ironic that Dominion claims that Fox did so in order to financially profit, while Dominion is suing in order to ensure that it continues to profit by convincing governments to invest in its products, which the company has privately admitted suck.

The timing of the media’s seizure of this narrative is also suspect, given that Tucker Carlson was recently granted exclusive access to 41,000 hours of J6 footage. It’s awfully convenient that this full court press to discredit Fox News comes just as Tucker prepares to present a counter narrative to Democrat claims of ‘insurrection.’

So too does Dominion’s seeming coordination with the leftist media to selectively leak and report their own discovery to discredit Fox raise suspicions about the political nature of Dominion.

Is Dominion really acting out of a genuine and apolitical desire to protect its reputation or are they colluding with Democrats to further the left’s political agenda to discredit Fox, clear the way for the return of a Democrat media monopoly, and  provide precedent and justification for the Democrats to silence and censor any speech that deviates from its narrative?

If Dominion’s objective was to mend its reputation and prove its fair and apolitical nature, this is having the opposite effect. This doesn’t prove the 2020 election wasn’t ‘stolen;’ rather, it raises additional suspicions about Dominion and their convenient relationship with Democrats.

We could resolve this problem today if states would simply abandon electronic voting machines and return to hand-count ballots. After all, prior to 2020 Democrats repeatedly questioned the security of these very machines, which today they suddenly love.

In 2006 a documentary called “Hacking Democracy” exposed the lies and vulnerability of the Diebold Election System — then used in a majority of states. Diebold retaliated and sought to discredit the filmmakers, calling the film a “sham.”

No defamation suit ensued and ultimately Diebold failed to recover. It was subsequently bought by another private corporation — Dominion Voting Systems, the very ones in question today.

The concern then was that our democracy was in the hands of a private corporation. It seems nothing has changed, except the left’s sudden embrace of that they once condemned.

The question today is this: Is Dominion in cahoots with the Democratic Party?