Can Kamala Harris Secure the Steal in November?

The certainty that Joe Biden couldn’t beat Trump is now slowly being replaced with Democrat certainty that Kamala can.

After leaving Americans wondering whether the President of the United States might be dead for nearly a week, Joe Biden was finally spotted emerging from a vehicle in Dover, Delaware and boarding Air Force One. Like an elusive Big Foot sighting, this too was rare and brief—enough to convince believers that he’s alive and too little to persuade skeptics otherwise.

The tumultuous events of the past month, which began with Biden’s calamitous June 27th debate performance, steadily crescendoed with Democrat demands that he exit the political stage, and finally climaxed on Sunday with his abrupt and mysterious compliance, remain shrouded largely in mystery.

Who orchestrated the storm? Was the debate a setup—the first domino intentionally felled to ensure this outcome? Are we to believe that Biden, whose very cognitive decline served as the rational for forcing his forfeiture of the nomination, had the mental acuity and verve to fight his own Party these past weeks to stay in the race?

Did President Biden actually test positive for COVID last Wednesday? Or was it merely the desperate cover needed to sequester and even hold Biden hostage while others in the Democratic Party carried out their scheme to bait and switch Biden with Kamala Harris?

Was the failed Trump assassination attempt on July 13th a historic and accidental failure on the part of the Secret Service? Or was it too part of a scheme planned and carried out by the same unknown parties that schemed to oust Joe Biden? How much of what we’ve experienced and witnessed as a Nation over the past month has been planned versus unplanned—reactive versus deliberate?

Had the Trump assassination attempt been successful, would Biden still remain the Democrat nominee for President?

Sadly, the answers to many of these questions can never be fully known. But the one thing we can be certain of, which we can deduce without knowing all the specifics, is that dark forces behind the scenes are indeed aligned and actively scheming to end ‘democracy’ once and for all.

Former Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheadle’s disastrous performance in the recent Congressional Hearing before the House Oversight Committee following the July 13th Trump assassination attempt did little to persuade Americans that the failure was not intentional. The subsequent refusal of the heads of secret service, FBI, and Homeland Security to testify have only fueled suspicions that the assassination attempt was more than mere ‘failure.’

The July 13th attempted assassination of a Presidential candidate and former President is far more grave and dangerous than the protests that took place on January 6th. A select committee was formed by Democrats in the aftermath of J6 to investigate then-President Trump’s role in the so-called ‘insurrection’—even after an impeachment hearing in the Senate had resulted in Trump’s exoneration.

And yet the same Democrats have zero genuine interest in investigating an assassination attempt. Not only was J6 not an insurrection, but former President Trump had no hand in it. Still, the media and Democratic Party unanimously concluded it was an insurrection and even jailed Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon for refusing to comply with Congressional subpoenas.

Does an assassination attempt not also warrant the creation of a select committee to investigate? Should the heads of the Secret Service, Homeland Security, and FBI not likewise be subpoenaed—their cell phone and email records not obtained and read? How can we be certain that Joe Biden and members of his administration weren’t involved in the assassination plot? After all, we are still told by the same Democrats that Trump incited the J6 insurrection.

Curiously, the Secret Service officials—the same ones refusing to testify—are now encouraging Trump to suspend scheduling large outdoor rallies and other events, citing their inability to protect him. Incompetence aside, would not such a suspension serve to interfere in the 2024 presidential election? Is it not election interference? Would Trump’s acquiescence to such an absurd suggestion during an election year not have the effect of hiding his immense popularity, especially if it were discovered that newly appointed Democrat Presidential candidate and nominee in waiting Kamala Harris proved unable to draw such sizable crowds in comparison?

Joe Biden wasn’t replaced with Kamala because she stands a better chance of defeating Trump. She was chosen to replace Biden because no American believed Biden could win. Democrats lost control of the narrative. They found themselves incapable of shaping perception—replacing reality with it.

Democrats plan to cheat, just as they did in 2020. The suspension of disbelief that permitted Democrats to get away with the stolen election of 2020 is now gone. No rational American believes Biden got 81 million votes—not even Democrat voters. Biden’s immense unpopularity gave them no choice—they had to reset.

Kamala Harris has never run against Trump. She provides a clean slate as it relates to votes cast. She is what Biden was in 2020—a blank canvas. Democrats are already painting Kamala as Barack Obama 2.0. Their Biden propaganda reached its end—it was futile. But their Kamala propaganda is just beginning. Now they can begin to tell us what isn’t true—that Kamala has energized Democrat voters and sow doubt in the minds of the American people regarding Trump’s still overwhelming popularity.

The certainty that Joe Biden couldn’t beat Trump is now slowly being replaced with Democrat certainty that Kamala can. It matters little that it isn’t true. The suspension of disbelief has returned. Should Democrats succeed in stealing the 2024 Presidential Election, the result will be accepted. Because she isn’t Joe Biden. And because they will have prepared everyone for that outcome.

Kamala Harris just might secure the steal in 2024.